Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884456›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of virology2026

Human immunodeficiency virus vaccines: Advances, challenges and future perspectives.

Subashchandrabose Varatharajan, Sathiamoorthy Krishnasai, Chandrashekaran Girish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Subashchandrabose VaratharajanDepartment of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India.
Sathiamoorthy KrishnasaiDepartment of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India.
Chandrashekaran GirishDepartment of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India. gcnx2005@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past 40 years, much effort has been made to develop a vaccine that can prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. But till today, this continues to be an unresolved challenge. The main obstacle in developing a vaccine is the ability of the virus to mutate at a swift rate, thereby evading the immune system. This has dramatically slowed the progress in the development of an HIV vaccine. Previous studies, like RV144, have demonstrated limited protection. Current trials, such as Imbokodo and Mosaico, have shown that the vaccines used were safe but did not demonstrate efficacy against the HIV-1 virus. With the advent of mRNA vaccines and broad neutralising antibodies, research has shown some progress in developing a promising candidate vaccine. Recently, the use of mosaic antigens and germline-targeting techniques has shed light on the development of a promising candidate vaccine. These techniques educate the immune system slowly. This review tracks the progress of HIV vaccine development to date and examines the most promising new strategies that could ultimately lead to the development of an efficacious vaccine.

Indexed as

Broadly neutralising antibodiesGermline-targetingHuman immunodeficiency virus-1 vaccineHuman immunodeficiency virus preventionImmune evasionMosaic antigensmRNA vaccinesPrime-boost strategyVaccine efficacy

Identifiers

PMID41884456
PMCPMC13010947

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.