ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Multi-Patient Analysis of Steroid-Induced Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Patients Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Steroid-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) is a frequent complication of glucocorticoid therapy, yet most prior studies have relied on sparse glucose measurements that limit understanding of timing and trajectory. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers high-resolution insights into these fluctuations with continuous temporal resolution that enables identification of transient and delayed glycemic responses. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm observational study, CGM data were analyzed from 58 adults with diabetes who received a single standard-of-care steroid injection for interventional pain management. Participants received dexamethasone (n=38), methylprednisolone (n=15), or triamcinolone (n=5). Dexcom G7 CGM recorded glucose every 5 minutes for up to 10 days post-injection. Glucose trajectories were summarized and stratified by steroid type, gender, and age (<64.6 vs ≥64.6 years). Results: Across steroid types, glucose increased within ~2 hours after injection. Dexamethasone produced the most consistent excursion, peaking at ~220-225 mg/dL and returning toward baseline by 24-36 hours. Methylprednisolone showed a more moderate delayed increase (~175-185 mg/dL) with sustained elevation for several days. Triamcinolone demonstrated similar peak levels (~220 mg/dL) but marked variability, limiting interpretability. Females generally exhibited higher and earlier peaks than males, most notably with dexamethasone. Younger patients showed more dynamic excursions and less uniform recovery, whereas older patients demonstrated flatter trajectories and more stable return toward baseline. Data completeness was highest through 48-72 hours post-injection. Discussion: This study provides one of the most detailed CGM characterizations of SIH, demonstrating steroid-specific and demographic-modified responses. Dexamethasone displayed a reproducible excursion phase, methylprednisolone a delayed pattern, and triamcinolone inconsistent variability. These findings highlight the utility of CGM for identifying temporal SIH features, with the first 48 to 72 hours yielding clinically reliable monitoring window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.