Evidence mapPaperPMID 41885176Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026

Pharmacological treatment after a first myocardial infarction in Sweden-long-term adherence and prognosis.

Maria Sakalaki, Michael Fu, Aldina Pivodic, Annika Rosengren, Lena Björck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria SakalakiDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3, våning 5, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4299-3672
Michael FuDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3, våning 5, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Aldina PivodicDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Annika RosengrenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3, våning 5, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5409-6605
Lena BjörckDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3, våning 5, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation 2021-0345Swedish Research Council 2023-02144University of Gothenburg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOptimizing pharmacological treatment for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction (MI) is crucial to prevent new events, but few have reported data over a long-term follow-up. The aim was to study long-term follow-up of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) as a part of secondary prevention after MI. METHODS AND

resultsPatients aged 18-84 years, hospitalized with a first acute MI between 2006 and 2022 were identified through the Swedish National Inpatient Register linked to the Prescribed Drug Register. GDMT was defined as antiplatelet/oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC), lipid lowering therapy, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Time-updated survival analyses were used to investigate the relationship between GDMT and mortality and/or recurrent MI. A total of 96 272 individuals with acute MI were included (29.3% women). At baseline 48.4% had hypertension, 18.8% diabetes mellitus and 13.5% heart failure. Use of GDMT decreased markedly during the first year after MI. During median follow-up of 5.6 years 32.9% died. Medication with antiplatelet/OAC, lipid lowering treatment and ACEi/ARB were associated with lower risk of all cause-mortality or recurrent MI hazard ratio (HR) 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.78], HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.67-0.70], HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.79-0.83] respectively (all P < 0.0001). Use of beta-blockers was associated with a slightly increased risk, HR 1.04 [95% CI 1.02-1.07], P = 0.0005.

conclusionsThe use of all GDMT is associated with lower risk for all-cause mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction. Long-term adherence of GDMT is suboptimal and there is a potential for further improvement.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionSecondary PreventionAdolescentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrognosisRegistriesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsMyocardial infarctionPharmacological treatmentSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID41885176
PMCPMC13457943

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.