ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Cultural and linguistic appropriateness of the HLS19-Q12 health literacy scale items among people in Norway with a Somali background.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although health literacy (HL) is essential for achieving health equity, limited knowledge exists about HL among migrant populations. The cultural and linguistic appropriateness of existing HL measurement scales is scarce. Hence, the aim of this study was to explore the cultural and linguistic appropriateness of HLS19-Q12 scale items among individuals of Somali background living in Norway. The HLS19-Q12 measure general HL and is a short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47). By using a sequential mixed methods approach, we present results from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods meta-inferences perspective. We used data from the Somali diaspora in the Norwegian part of the Health Literacy Survey 2019 (HLS19) and tested the data against the partial credit Rasch model. Cross-cultural cognitive interviews (CCCI) were then conducted, in which data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The mixed methods approach gave us a comprehensive understanding. The CCCIs provided detailed insights into deviating items identified by the Rasch modelling, and the CCCIs revealed that more items were problematic than those flagged by Rasch modelling. A large body of literature examine psychometric properties of different scales. While this is important, this article also shows the challenges and implications in HL surveys regarding developing health equity policies for all. Hence, exploring the cultural and linguistically validation of scale items should be a standard. The Somali version of the HLS19-Q12 scale items could not be considered culturally or linguistically appropriate for people with a Somali background living in Norway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.