ArticleNature communications2026
An integrated germline and somatic genomic model for coronary artery disease.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene-Air Pollution Interaction in Cardiovascular Disease: Lights and Shadows in a Tangled Risk Factor Network.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Improving Polygenic Risk Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in East Asian Populations.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple germline and somatic genomic factors are associated with risk of coronary artery disease, but there is no single measure of risk that integrates all information from a DNA sample. To address this gap, we develop an integrated genomic model that includes six germline and somatic genetic drivers for coronary artery disease, including polygenic risk score, genetically-proxied proteomic/metabolomic risk scores, and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. We evaluated its predictive power in the UK Biobank (N = 391,536), and validate it using data from the TOPMed program (N = 34,177). The 10-year coronary artery disease risk based on the integrated genomic model profile ranges from 1.1% to 15.5% in the UK Biobank and from 3.8% to 33.0% in TOPMed, with a more pronounced gradient in males than females. The integrated genomic model captures the cumulative effect of multiple genetic drivers, identifying individuals at high risk for coronary artery disease despite lacking any single high-risk genetic factor, as well as individuals at low risk despite carrying known high-risk factors. In middle age, the integrated genomic model augments the performance of the Pooled Cohort Equations, a clinical risk calculator for coronary artery disease. While the integrated genomic model yields only modest incremental predictive value over polygenic risk score at the population level, it identifies approximately 13% of high-risk individuals not detected by polygenic risk score alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.