ArticleScientific reports2026
Ultrasound biomechanical indices in carotid artery disease: evaluation of shear modulus, circumferential stress, longitudinal stress, and stiffness index-a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biomechanical condition and properties of the arterial wall illustrate a crucial principle regarding the basis and development of arterial diseases. This study aimed to investigate indicators such as stiffness index (β), circumferential stress (CSmean), longitudinal stress (LSmean), and shear modulus (SMmean) alterations of the left common carotid artery in human individuals afflicted with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease, in order to determine the relationship among the mentioned indicators. The current study introduced methods for tracing simultaneous alterations in the lumen and inter-adventitial diameters, intima–media thickness, longitudinal movement, and velocity of the left common carotid artery (CCA). The mentioned parameters were measured in 136 male subjects, classified into four groups: control (n = 35), mild (n = 34), moderate (n = 34), and severe (n = 33) stenosis, in a cross-sectional design using B-mode and Doppler ultrasound systems. These basic parameters were used to calculate the mentioned biomechanical indicators. There was a significant increasing trend for the above-mentioned biomechanical indicators of the CCA from the control to the severe stenosis group (p < 0.05). In addition, the results of the present study illustrated a significant relationship between SMmean and β, CSmean, and LSmean in subjects with various degrees of stenosis (p < 0.05). We conclude that indicators such as SMmean, β, CSmean, and LSmean could be beneficial for assessing atherosclerotic human carotid arteries and may also provide important information for physicians regarding appropriate therapeutic strategies, including interventional examination, balloon angioplasty, stent deployment, graft replacement, and discrimination of vulnerable plaques from others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.