ArticleScientific reports2026
ResSeMo: deep convolutional neural network integration for high-accuracy waste classification and efficient processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EcoNet-Multi: optimising deep learning frameworks for robust waste detection in diverse global environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As urban waste issues become increasingly severe, traditional waste classification methods can no longer meet the demands for efficiency and accuracy. Deep learning technology has gradually become a key solution to this problem, yet improving classification accuracy, processing efficiency, and model adaptability in complex scenarios remains a challenge. This paper proposes a lightweight waste classification model, ResSeMo, based on multi-module collaborative optimization. The model combines ResNeXt's multi-scale feature extraction, SENet's channel attention mechanism, and MobileNetV3's lightweight design to effectively improve classification accuracy, reduce computational overhead, and enhance robustness in complex backgrounds. Experimental results show that ResSeMo achieved 91.3% accuracy on the TrashNet dataset and 86.9% on the TACO dataset, maintaining high stability in disturbance experiments. Specifically, with Gaussian noise and random blur, ResSeMo's accuracy dropped by only 4.1% on TrashNet and 6.4% on TACO. Compared to traditional models like VGG16, it demonstrates a clear advantage in anti-disturbance performance. This model not only performs excellently on standard datasets but also adapts to waste classification needs in complex environments, providing strong support for smart waste classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.