Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888940›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2026

DBSCAN applied to EHRs data from patients with glioblastoma clusters patients based on cytosolic Hsp70 protein, sex, and brain subventricular zone.

Davide Chicco, Srinjoy Dora, Luca Oneto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davide ChiccoUniversità di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. davide.chicco@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-7142
Srinjoy DoraTbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0806-9842
Luca OnetoUniversitá di Genova, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8445-395X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain cancer that kills approximately one hundred thousand people worldwide every year. Unfortunately, treatment and therapy for patients with this disease are complicated and have limited efficacy in improving individuals’ chances of survival. Electronic health records (EHRs) contain patient information collected routinely at hospitals through medical visits and laboratory tests, providing an interesting source of data for computational analyses. Clustering is an area of unsupervised machine learning where an algorithm partitions data according to certain statistical properties or rules, thereby identifying hidden patterns and correlations that would otherwise be difficult to notice. In this study, we applied several clustering techniques to three open datasets (Munich2019, Tainan2020, and Utrecht2019) derived from electronic health records, which included clinical, genetic, and administrative features of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, considering two possible clusters. We evaluated our clustering results with the Density-Based Clustering Validation (DBCV) index, a relatively new score capable of accurately assessing both convex-shaped and concave-shaped clusters. Among the methods tested, Density-based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) yielded the best results across all three datasets. We then analyzed the features of the clusters identified by DBSCAN and found that cytosolic Hsp70 protein in the Munich2019 dataset, sex in the Tainan2020 dataset, and brain subventricular zone in the Utrecht2019 resulted significantly capable to distinguish the two clusters.

Indexed as

ClusteringEHRsElectronic health recordsGlioblastomaMachine learningUnsupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41888940
PMCPMC13147812

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.