ReviewDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2026
The effect of hydrogen-rich water interventions on lipid profiles in adults with overweight or obesity and associated metabolic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveObesity-related dyslipidemia remains a significant health challenge, contributing to increased cardiovascular risk. Hydrogen-rich water (HRW) has been proposed as a potential adjunctive intervention due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of HRW on lipid profiles in adults with overweight or obesity.
methodsWe searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to November 2025 that compared HRW with placebo or standard water in adults with mean body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m². Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsTwelve articles comprising 13 RCTs (n = 757 participants) were included. HRW significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC) (WMD: − 6.71 mg/dL; 95% CI: − 10.38 to − 3.04; P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD: − 3.21 mg/dL; 95% CI: − 6.31 to − 0.10; P = 0.043). A small reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was observed (WMD: − 1.16 mg/dL; 95% CI: − 1.92 to − 0.40; P = 0.003). Triglycerides showed no significant change (WMD: − 4.21 mg/dL; 95% CI: − 17.75 to 9.32; P = 0.54). Most trials enrolled overweight or obese adults with cardiometabolic comorbidities. Subgroup analyses were underpowered and considered hypothesis-generating.
conclusionHRW supplementation in overweight or obese adults produces small, statistically detectable but clinically modest reductions in TC and LDL-C, with minimal effects on TG and HDL-C. These effects are below thresholds considered meaningful for cardiovascular risk reduction and should not justify routine use of HRW as a lipid-lowering therapy outside of research settings and these findings primarily apply to adults with preexisting metabolic conditions and should not be generalized to all overweight/obese individuals. Any potential role remains limited to an investigational adjunct, and further adequately powered, longer-term RCTs are needed before HRW can be considered in dyslipidemia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.