ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Automatic Generation of a Mechanical Properties Question-Answering Data Set for Language Model Benchmarking: A Comparative Study of BERT, XLNet, and LLaMA Models.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contextualized language models offer new opportunities for mining materials-science information from literature, but progress is limited by the absence of domain-specific question-answering (QA) data sets. This study addresses this by introducing MechQA, a data set of 202,068 pairs of questions and answers about mechanical properties that have been automatically distilled from 125,967 articles in the literature. Unlike small manually curated QA benchmarks or approaches that rely on domain-specific pretraining, MechQA provides a large-scale, automatically generated training resource derived directly from the primary literature. It covers five fundamental mechanical properties of materials: ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, fracture strength, Young's modulus, and ductility. Manual evaluation of this data set confirmed its high quality (precision 83.76%, recall 89.09%, F1 score 86.34%). We apply MechQA to fine-tune three representative transformer models: two extractive models, BERT-base and XLNet-base, each with 110 M parameters, and a generative LLaMA-3.1-Instruct model with 8B parameters fine-tuned using low-rank adaptation (LoRA). The MechQA data set was partitioned into 181,722 training and 20,346 validation QA pairs for this application. On the validation set, domain-specific extractive models achieve strong Exact Match (EM) and F1 score performance (BERT: 78.03% EM/84.50% F1; XLNet: 78.21% EM/84.70% F1) with improved expected calibration error (ECE) of 7.98% and 6.25%, respectively, while the LLaMA-domain model achieves 80.48% EM/86.25% F1 with an ECE of 8.08%. Notably, the two extractive models exhibit competitive performance despite their significantly smaller parameter size compared to the LLaMA model. These results demonstrate that automatic QA data set generation, coupled with targeted fine-tuning, provides an effective data-centric method for domain adaptation of language models for materials science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.