SynthesisLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2026
Low-Dose vs. Standard Care Iv Human Albumin During Large-Volume Paracentesis in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low-Dose vs. Standard Care Iv Human Albumin During Large-Volume Paracentesis in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cirrhosis is a global health concern, with ascites being the most prevalent decompensating event. Intravenous (IV) human albumin (HA) is administered during large-volume paracentesis (LVP) to prevent complications. The standard (6-8 g HA/L ascites) is empirically chosen, potentially leading to overtreatment and added costs. We reviewed evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of reduced versus standard-care HA dosing during LVP. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus (up to January 31, 2025). We included RCTs and cohort studies in adults with cirrhosis undergoing LVP, comparing low-dose (≤ 6 g/L or ≤ 20 g total) to standard-dose (> 6 g/L or > 20 g total) HA. Outcomes included paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD), renal impairment, hyponatremia, other decompensating events, and survival. Quality assessment used Cochrane risk-of-bias tools and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Five studies (three full-text, two abstracts) met inclusion criteria. Low-dose regimens (2-6.5 g/L) showed no significant difference compared to standard care (6-8.3 g/L) in PICD (reported in two studies) and renal dysfunction (reported in five studies). Other secondary outcomes, including hyponatremia, GI bleeding, HE, infections, and reaccumulating ascites, also showed no statistical differences. While these findings indicate potential for dose reduction, definitive confirmation via meta-analysis was not feasible due to methodological heterogeneity. Available evidence suggests that reduced-dose IV HA (≤ 6 g/L) is as effective and safe as standard-dose HA (6-8 g/L) during LVP. However, the quality of the current evidence is limited by small sample sizes and suboptimal study designs, and well-designed, adequately powered future studies are required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.