ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Respiratory Organ-on-a-Chip for Disease Modeling: From Architecture to Functional Integration.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respiratory diseases remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and arise from tightly coupled multicellular interactions that occur under continuous airflow and cyclic mechanical strain. However, the platforms most commonly used to study these processes, animal models and conventional 2D cell cultures, frequently decouple the variables that govern human pathophysiology, thereby limiting mechanistic resolution and translational predictability. Respiratory organ-on-chips (ROCs) aim to bridge this gap by reconstituting key structural, mechanical, and microenvironmental features of the human respiratory system in controllable, human-relevant settings, enabling quantitative interrogation of disease dynamics and therapeutic responses. Guided by respiratory anatomy and region-specific functions as design principles, this review integrates ROC architectural strategies with core functional modules and synthesizes how these engineering decisions shape biological performance and translational relevance across inflammation, infection, fibrosis, injury, and cancer. We further examine progress toward industrial translation and propose a decision-making framework that aligns disease-specific research questions with system integration requirements while identifying key technical bottlenecks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.