ArticleJournal of biophotonics2026
Monitoring of Tissue Perfusion During Arterial Occlusion With Remote Photoplethysmographic Imaging.
Article in Journal of biophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArterial occlusion is commonly used clinically, yet no standardized protocol exists for cuff pressure or placement. Different pressures and locations may elicit varying physiological responses. This study investigates whether local and systemic reactions vary with pressure and cuff location.
methodsHealthy volunteers underwent arterial occlusion at the wrist or upper arm using a cuff inflated to 150 or 200 mmHg. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) was used to monitor the occluded and control hands. We analyzed AC components (heart rate, respiratory rate, low-frequency activity) and signal amplitude changes in red and green channels during occlusion and reperfusion.
resultsNo significant differences were observed in local responses between 150 and 200 mmHg occlusions or between cuff positions.
conclusionsThese findings establish 150 mmHg cuff pressure on the lower arm as a suitable arterial occlusion protocol and support rPPG for detecting perfusion changes. Minor systemic differences were noted compared to the control hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.