ArticleDigital health
Understanding dietitians' technology design needs through user-centered design of a clinical decision support system for patient-centered diabetes education materials.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dietitians report insufficient time and low-quality educational materials limit patient-centered care for conditions like diabetes. In other clinical practice areas, technology facilitates patient-centered care, but few practice-based technologies have been developed for dietetics. Thus, little is known about what dietitians need to incorporate technology-based solutions into practice. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand dietitians' design needs for a novel education material clinical decision support system (CDSS) to customize materials for improved patient-centered care. Design: Design needs were evaluated with qualitative user interviews during which participants responded to mockups of the proposed technology. Interviewers coded transcripts to identify themes around three key constructs known to drive technology adoption: perceived usefulness, usability, and workflow integration. Participants/setting: Dietitians (n = 9) who were licensed in Texas and provided nutrition education to patients as part of their practice participated in the interviews. Results: Customization drove perceived usefulness, and efficiency drove perceived usability of the CDSS. Participants indicated that workflow integration would depend on if the CDSS met both customization and efficiency needs. Some participants indicated that efficiency was more important than patient-level customization; these participants suggested the possibility of customizing handouts for their typical patient population instead of individual patients. Conclusions: Dietitians are interested in a CDSS that customizes education materials, with efficiency being essential to adoption. Incorporating these insights into future CDSS design could improve the successful adoption of technology for supporting patient-centered dietetic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.