SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Hot topics and trends in acupuncture for herpes zoster from 2015 to 2025: a bibliometric and knowledge graph analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to systematically and comprehensively analyze global research trends, knowledge structure, and emerging hotspots in acupuncture for herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Methods: Publications from January 1, 2015, to October 1, 2025 were retrieved from six major databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, Weipu, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and Scopus. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed to perform co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword analyses, visualizing research collaborations, thematic evolution, and knowledge networks. Results: A total of 2,309 publications (2,165 Chinese and 144 English) were included. In the Chinese databases, publication output peaked in 2018, while English-language publications steadily increased, surpassing 20 per year after 2022. All Chinese studies originated in China, whereas 21 countries contributed to the English-language literature, with China, the United States, Australia, and South Korea as the top contributors. Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, and Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were the most productive institutions. Co-authorship and citation analyses identified core authors and influential journals, including PAIN, Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and J Pain Res. Keyword co-occurrence and clustering analyses revealed frequent topics in Chinese publications, such as PHN, acupuncture and cupping, fire needle, TCM, and Jiaji point, whereas English publications frequently addressed HZ, PHN, neuropathic pain, management, and acupuncture. Timeline and citation-burst analyses indicated shifts in research focus over time, with early studies emphasizing traditional techniques and clinical efficacy, and later studies increasingly addressing mechanisms, patient-reported outcomes, and systematic evidence synthesis. Conclusion: Global research on acupuncture for HZ and PHN has increasingly shifted toward precision and evidence-based approaches. Comparative analysis indicates that Chinese literature primarily emphasizes clinical applications and traditional Chinese medicine techniques, whereas international studies focus more on methodological rigor and mechanistic evidence, underscoring the need for strengthened international collaboration and high-quality multicenter trials to advance the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.