ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Prone retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of prone retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (prRALP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), an innovative approach designed to optimize surgical exposure and suturing. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed four patients who underwent prRALP between September 2023 and May 2024. The surgical technique involved prone positioning and multi-port robotic access, enabling direct posterior exposure of the renal pelvis and proximal ureter. Primary outcomes included operation time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), and postoperative renal function (eGFR). Success was defined by radiographic resolution of obstruction, symptom relief, and no need for reintervention. Results: All procedures were completed robotically without open conversion and reoperation. Mean OT was 64.6 ± 14.4 min, with minimal blood loss of 27.5 ± 15.0 mL and no transfusions. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.3 ± 0.5 days. One minor complication (fever, Clavien 1) occurred (25%). Postoperative eGFR improved by 1.3 ± 14.2 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: prRALP demonstrates feasibility and safety, leveraging prone position to enhance retroperitoneal access and suturing precision. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate its technical benefits and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.