ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Distinguishing early from late mild cognitive impairment: a multi-level analysis of regional morphometry and KLS-derived network topology.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Distinguishing between early Mild Cognitive Impairment (EMCI) and late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI) is crucial for clinical trials, but objective biomarkers are lacking. We therefore examined regional morphometry and network topology across cognitively normal (CN), EMCI, and LMCI groups to address this gap. We also evaluated whether combining these features could effectively classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes. Methods: We analyzed T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 208 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants (67 CN, 83 EMCI, 58 LMCI). We used both voxel- and surface-based morphometry to measure local atrophy and combined this with graph analysis of individual structural covariance networks (SCNs). We also performed correlation and machine learning analyses. Results: We found that cortical thickness (CT) in EMCI was not significantly different from CN, but it was significantly reduced in the LMCI group. The right hippocampus and the left thalamus, however, showed a significant difference between CN and EMCI. In the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence-based similarity (KLS) network analysis, the EMCI group showed a greater randomization when compared to the LMCI group, while LMCI was accompanied by elevated nodal centrality in the left hippocampus and orbital frontal region. Correlation analysis confirmed this was a maladaptive phenomenon, as higher centrality was linked to poorer cognitive performance. Finally, a classifier combining these structural and network features successfully differentiated the MCI subtypes. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that differences in Gray matter volume (GMV) may be more easily observed in the EMCI group. We identified a corresponding non-linear pattern of network topology, characterized by randomization in the EMCI group than in the LMCI. These multi-faceted biomarkers enabled the accurate machine-learning-based differentiation of MCI subtypes, offering a powerful framework for improving patient stratification in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.