ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Promoter hypomethylation of
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), manifesting as white matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunar infarctions, and cerebral microbleeds on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has been linked to developmental epigenetic alterations. This study aimed to identify and validate gene-specific promoter methylation changes as epigenetic markers associated with SVD, using MRI-defined imaging features and blood inflammatory cells. Methods: Genome-wide promoter methylation was profiled using the Infinium MethylationEPIC v2.0 array in peripheral inflammatory cells from 16 patients without SVD and 16 patients with all three imaging features, including WMH, lacunes, and microbleeds on MRI. Candidate CpGs were defined as consensus DMPs detected by both minfi and SeSAMe (nominal P < 0.05 in both pipelines with concordant direction), filtered by absolute delta beta >0.10 and promoter proximity (TSS200/TSS1500). Validation was performed to determine whether these gene-specific promoter methylations could serve as independent variables predicting the presence of SVD imaging features when combined with established cardiovascular risk factors, using data from 766 patients with ischemic stroke (53 [6.9%] without SVD and 713 [93.1%] with ≥1 SVD imaging feature). Hierarchical logistic regression analysis and a deep learning model were applied. Subgroup analyses using multinomial logistic regression were performed to assess whether gene-specific promoter methylation could independently predict WMH or lacunes. Results: EPIC profiling identified 17 promoter regions with significant differences between groups, corresponding to Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.