ReviewRegenerative therapy2026
Pathing the way from regulatory approval to market access for gene therapy products (GTPs): An integrative review in the US, EU5, Japan and China.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to summarize the current practices and mechanisms of market access, pricing and reimbursements for gene therapy products (GTPs) in major jurisdictions, and to identify the key barriers and facilitators affecting the translation of GTPs from regulatory approval to market access across the countries. Methods: An integrated scoping review was conducted to identify publicly available literature and documents on the marketing access, pricing and reimbursement of GTPs under the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Key barriers and potential enablers were identified and thematically analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results: Thirty-four studies published between 2020 and May 2025 were included in this study. A total of 21 GTPs had received market authorization from the FDA, EMA, PMDA, or NMPA, targeting four major disease areas: genetic diseases ( Conclusion: By adopting the CFIR framework, this study has systematically identified the key challenges and potential solutions in translating GTPs from regulatory approval to patient access. To ensure effective access, it is essential to adopt context-adapted value assessment models, diversified payment mechanisms, and coordinated policy strategies to guide the implementation processes. Building on international experiences, advancing localized implementation strategies encompassing tailored value frameworks, innovative payment models, regional pilots and institutional readiness offer actionable pathways for developing forward-looking access and reimbursement systems for GTPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.