ArticleExposome2026
Scaling sensor metadata extraction for exposure health using LLMs.
Article in Exposome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The rapid evolution and diversity of sensor technologies, coupled with inconsistencies in how sensor metadata is reported across formats and sources, present significant challenges for generating exposomes and exposure health research. Objective: Despite the development of standardized metadata schemas, the process of extracting sensor metadata from unstructured sources remains largely manual and unscalable. To address this bottleneck, we developed and evaluated a large language model (LLM)-based pipeline for automating sensor metadata extraction and harmonization from publicly available exposure health literature. Methods: Using GPT-4 in a zero-shot setting, we constructed a pipeline that parses full-text PDFs to extract metadata and harmonizes output into structured formats. Results: Our automated pipeline achieved substantial efficiency gains in completing extractions much faster than manual review and demonstrated strong performance with 88.0% accuracy, 88.0% precision, 93.0% recall, and an F1-score of 90.0%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and scalability of leveraging LLMs to automate sensor metadata extraction for exposure health, reducing manual burden while enhancing metadata completeness and consistency. Our findings support the integration of LLM-driven pipelines into exposure health informatics platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.