ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
A comprehensive evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of concentrated growth factor against biofilms associated with endodontic diseases: An in vitro study.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Concentrated Growth Factor (CGF), derived from a specific centrifugation protocol designed to optimize the concentration of growth factors and platelet-derived cytokines, has been investigated in the context of regenerative treatments. However, the potential antibiofilm properties of CGF against endodontic pathogens remain to be clarified. This in vitro study evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness of CGF against the biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Material and Methods: Blood samples were collected from otherwise healthy volunteers. A dedicated centrifugation device and protocol were used for CGF preparation. The antimicrobial activity of the CGF was observed and recorded against standard strains of E. faecalis and C. albicans using a disc agar diffusion method to determine the inhibition zone, and broth microdilution to measure the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). A crystal violet assay and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were conducted for biofilm assessment, using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 5.25% as a positive control. This was followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to analyze the morphology of the biofilm formed on the dentinal surface. A statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test with GraphPad Prism (version 8.4.3). Results: An inhibition zone was observed in both the CGF and NaOCl groups against both microorganisms. MIC was found for CGF against both microorganisms at a concentration of 50% v/v, while MBC and MFC were obtained at a concentration of 100% v/v. CFU counting revealed a significant reduction in viable microbial cells following the treatment of E. faecalis and C. albicans biofilms with NaOCl and CGF compared to the control group (P<0.05). NaOCl resulted in the most pronounced reduction of the biofilms (76.86% for E. faecalis and 86.52% for C. albicans). However, there was a 32.97% reduction of the viable microbial cells of E. faecalis and a 35.97% reduction of the viable microbial cells of C. albicans in biofilm treated with CGF. The SEM results also showed a notable decrease in the concentration of fungal and bacterial cells. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that CGF may exhibit antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties against endodontic pathogens. Hence, CGF may contribute to reducing microbial load and enhancing the outcome of regenerative treatments within infected root canal systems.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.