ArticleTransactions on artificial intelligence2026
Recent Advancements of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Article in Transactions on artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a versatile non-invasive neuromodulation approach that can alter cortical excitability and affect network plasticity. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) offer an opportunity to transform tDCS from largely heuristic practice into a quantitatively informed, adaptive intervention paradigm. Here, we synthesize developments from 2020 to 2025 at the intersection of tDCS and ML. Search results from structured PubMed and Google Scholar queries were screened for eligibility based on predefined inclusion criteria, retaining peer-reviewed studies that applied ML techniques to tDCS related studies. Eligible studies were evaluated for data integrity, and ML model validation methodology. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. Across these studies, ML was applied to heterogeneous datasets, including electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and clinico-demographic features, to predict stimulation outcomes, characterize neural responses, and identify biomarkers of tDCS sensitivity. Support vector machines and random forests remain prevalent, reflecting the modest scale and exploratory nature of current datasets; most studies rely on early-stage clinical or preclinical cohorts, resulting in promising yet fragmented evidence. Nevertheless, emerging results illustrate how ML can reveal latent physiological structure, guide dose-response optimization, and support the translation of tDCS toward precision neuromodulation. Drawing on this integrated analysis, we highlight key directions for the field: multimodal integration that unifies electrophysiological, structural, and behavioral signatures; incorporation of biophysically grounded forward models and pretrained deep-learning architectures; and development of adaptive, closed-loop control strategies capable of personalizing stimulation in real time. Together, these advances chart a pathway toward ML-guided tDCS systems that are mechanistically informed, clinically actionable, and scalable for widespread application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.