ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Summary of the best evidence for non-pharmacological interventions for dyslipidemia in patients with coronary heart disease.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Retrieve, evaluate, and summarize evidence from domestic and international sources regarding non-pharmacological interventions for dyslipidemia in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), providing reference for clinical practice. Methods: Following the "6S" evidence pyramid model, a systematic search was conducted for literature on non-pharmacological interventions for dyslipidemia in CHD patients, both domestically and internationally, covering the period from January 2014 to December 2025. Two researchers independently screened and evaluated the studies for inclusion, after which the evidence was synthesized. Results: A total of 31 studies were ultimately included, comprising 15 English-language publications and 16 Chinese-language publications. Thirty-one evidence points were summarized, covering seven evidence themes: multidisciplinary team formation, assessment, lipid-lowering targets, lifestyle modification, non-pharmacological traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) interventions, health education, and follow-up management. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive summary of the best available evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for dyslipidemia in patients with CHD. The findings can serve as a valuable reference for clinical practitioners, enabling healthcare professionals to develop personalized intervention plans based on the lipid profiles and specific needs of CHD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.