ArticleJournal of virology2026
Impact of maternal antibodies and weaning stress on the replication and transmission of human H3N2 influenza A in piglets.
Article in Journal of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human seasonal H3N2 influenza A viruses (IAV) are repeatedly transmitted to swine. Modern indoor swine production facilitates close contact between human employees and pigs in their care during certain husbandry events, like weaning, that may increase the chance of interspecies transmission of IAV. This study investigated the effect of matched and mismatched maternal-derived antibodies (MDA) acquired from homologous and heterologous vaccinated sows on piglet susceptibility to a human-like H3N2 virus, generated to mimic the 2010.1-lineage H3N2 introduction from humans to swine. Additionally, we assessed the impact of weaning-related stress, along with immune status, on transmission to naïve direct-contact pigs. Seeder piglets from immune- and weaning-status groups were directly inoculated. Two days post-inoculation (DPI), naïve direct-contact pigs were placed with seeders. Nasal swabs were collected daily in seeder and contact pigs to evaluate shedding and transmission kinetics, and seeders were euthanized at 5 DPI to evaluate viral replication in the lower respiratory tract. Matched MDA was effective in reducing nasal shedding in challenged pigs and minimizing transmission to contacts, whereas mismatched MDA was not. Additionally, there was an increase in shedding and transmission in weaned pigs with mismatched MDA compared to littermates that remained on the sow. These results identify critical control points in swine production to implement practices for mitigating human-to-swine and swine-to-swine transmission to prevent the establishment of novel lineages in pig populations.IMPORTANCEDefining the factors that increase the susceptibility of pigs to infection with human influenza A viruses (IAV) is critical to understand why those viruses transmit to the new host. IAV is frequently detected in nursing pigs, where it was shown that maternal-derived antibodies (MDA) may reduce clinical signs but may not prevent infection and transmission. Infected weaned piglets can then move viruses from the sow farm to offsite nurseries, where they can cause outbreaks with clinical disease as MDA wanes. Determining management practices that can be modified to reduce interspecies transmission of viruses to pigs is economically beneficial to the swine industry and could help define measures to prevent new spillover events. Reducing spillover of human IAV into pig populations also benefits public health by reducing genomic and phenotypic diversity in swine and the subsequent potential for zoonotic transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.