ArticleTurk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry2026
A Psychiatric Perspective on Bariatric Surgery and Obesity: What Do Psychiatrists Think and Do? A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the knowledge levels, attitudes, and referral practices of psychiatrists regarding obesity and bariatric surgery.
methodIn this descriptive, cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was administered to 169 psychiatrists and 75 psychiatry residents across Turkiye. The questionnaire included sections on demographic characteristics, clinical approaches to obesity, sources of information about bariatric surgery, referral tendencies, psychiatric contraindications, and knowledge regarding the postoperative period. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire created by the researchers and administered online via Google Forms.
resultsMost participants were able to define obesity (82.8%) correctly, but a large proportion reported that they do not routinely record patients’ height and weight in clinical practice (71.3%). It was reported by 78.7% of the participants that they had conducted at least one psychiatric evaluation prior to bariatric surgery, and 69.7% stated that they would refer patients for surgery when appropriate indications were present. Psychotic disorders, substance use disorders, and eating disorders were most frequently considered as contraindications, while anxiety and personality disorders were generally not regarded as contraindications. The level of knowledge regarding the conditions that need to be considered after surgery varied, with predominant lack of knowledge regarding nutritional management. Approximately one-third of the participants reported that they do not have sufficient knowledge about obesity treatment.
conclusionAlthough the general attitudes towards bariatric surgery are positive, there were differences in levels of knowledge and some barriers affecting referral to surgery were evident. These findings highlight the need to develop educational programs aimed at enhancing psychiatrists’ knowledge and skills related to bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.