Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892151›Full record

ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2026

Automation of Polysaccharide Quantification: A Rapid High-Throughput Assay Enabled by Liquid Handling Technology.

Samuel Nicacio, Winston Umakanth Balasundaram, Aboli Bhingarkar, Daniel Cho, Rashmi Ghayal, Anup Datta, Subhash V Kapre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel NicacioQuality Control, Inventprise, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Winston Umakanth BalasundaramQuality Control, Inventprise, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Aboli BhingarkarQuality Control, Inventprise, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Daniel ChoQuality Control, Inventprise, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Rashmi GhayalQuality Control, Inventprise, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Anup DattaBacterial Research and Development, Inventprise, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Subhash V KapreInventprise, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different methods are used today for polysaccharide quantitation, including HPLC and various colorimetric assays. Among these, the anthrone-sulfuric acid assay (anthrone assay) is popular when the sample matrix is suitable, such as in purified polysaccharides and monovalent bulk conjugate components of glycoconjugate vaccines. While relatively safe, quick, and affordable, the anthrone assay requires significant operator time to complete and is not suited to high-throughput processing. Furthermore, the anthrone-sulfuric acid reagent presents a unique challenge to automation efforts due to its corrosive properties. Reported here is an automated anthrone assay via a liquid handling system (LHS). Twenty-three serotypes of pneumococcal (PNU) polysaccharide were quantified with the traditional anthrone assay and subsequently analyzed using the anthrone LHS method. The anthrone LHS method was evaluated for accuracy compared to the manual method and later validated according to ICH Q2 (R2) guidelines. To our knowledge, this is the first fully unattended and corrosion-mitigated anthrone assay validated under ICH Q2 (R2), capable of overnight batch operation. The developed assay can quantify polysaccharides with an accuracy of 81-115%, is precise to a coefficient of variation of <7.0%, and is linear between 30 and 650 µg/mL range (R

Indexed as

anthroneautomationpneumococcalpolysaccharidevalidation

Identifiers

PMID41892151
PMCPMC13023583

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.