SynthesisCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, despite existing effective prevention strategies. Pharmacists are increasingly involved in various colorectal cancer prevention programs and are well-positioned to support these prevention efforts. In this systematic review, we investigate evidence regarding pharmacist-led interventions for colorectal cancer prevention by conducting a comprehensive search across the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were included only if they examined the role of pharmacists in early colorectal cancer detection and screening, lifestyle counseling to support prevention, and risk awareness and education. Risk of bias was assessed using the Pre-Post Quality Assessment developed by the National Institutes of Health. A total of 1405 studies were identified, of which four were included in the review. The included studies were quasi-experimental studies that mainly addressed screening awareness with fecal immunochemical test distribution, referrals, and counseling. The results of these studies showed an increase in screening participation, an improvement in knowledge of colorectal cancer risk factors and screening, and enhanced colorectal cancer referral rates. This systematic review highlights the potential of pharmacist-led interventions in enhancing colorectal cancer prevention efforts, but further well-designed studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.