ReviewBiology2026
Organizational Principles of Biological Systems.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How does the complex, adaptive, and autonomous organization of life emerge from the laws of physics and information? This review argues that the answer lies in a convergent set of universal organizational principles that constitute a physical and informational grammar of the living. Living systems are dissipative structures that achieve organizational closure-materially and energetically open, yet causally closed-thereby attaining genuine autonomy and agency. Their architecture exhibits fractal and modular scaling laws that maximize energy flow, robustness, and evolvability under universal physical constraints. Critically, organisms operate at critical transitions-zones of controlled instability where fluctuations amplify information processing, transforming noise into adaptive signal. This self-organized criticality enables functional degeneracy, relational redundancy, and evolutionary antifragility. Cognition emerges as a distributed process of active inference, operating through a predictive-corrective cycle that integrates perception, action, and learning under the Free Energy Principle. From molecular networks to ecosystems, the same physico-informational grammars unfold recursively, revealing a deep organizational holography: the principles of organization are replicated across scales. Evolution under the Law of Increasing Functional Information is not random drift, but a directional expansion of functional complexity-a thermodynamic gradient towards greater agency. This synthesis challenges biological exceptionalism: the trajectory from thermodynamics to cognition is continuous, physically constrained, and potentially inevitable. Life does not violate physical laws-it fulfills them in regimes of high informational complexity, instantiating fundamental principles in self-organized architectures capable of prediction, memory, and purpose. The objective of this work is to articulate how the synthesis of these principles not only unifies physics and biology, but also illuminates the profound continuity between thermodynamics, chemistry, informational constraints, organization, and the mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.