ArticleClocks & sleep2026
Sleep and Sleep Disorder Knowledge Among Physicians Working in Qatar's Primary Health Care Corporation: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Clocks & sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep is a fundamental biological process essential for physical, cognitive, and mental health, yet sleep disorders remain underrecognized in primary care. Given the central role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in early identification and management, this study aimed to assess sleep and sleep disorder knowledge among PCPs working within the Primary Health Care Corporation in Qatar. A cross-sectional study was conducted using the validated 30-item Assessment of Sleep Knowledge in Medical Education (ASKME) questionnaire, alongside demographic and clinical practice variables. The primary outcomes were the overall ASKME percentage score and participants achieving adequate sleep knowledge (≥60%). A total of 110 PCPs were included in the analysis. The mean overall ASKME score was 56.5%, and 44.5% of participants achieved adequate sleep knowledge. Knowledge was highest in circadian sleep-wake regulation and basic sleep principles, and lowest in common sleep disorders, sleep architecture, and the effects of drugs and alcohol on sleep. In multivariable logistic regression, years of clinical experience was the only factor independently associated with adequate sleep knowledge. These findings indicate persistent gaps in clinically relevant sleep knowledge among PCPs and underscore the need for targeted sleep education within primary care to support early and effective management of sleep disorders. However, the achieved sample size was substantially smaller than the initially calculated target of 260, limiting statistical power; therefore, the non-significant findings may reflect a Type II error, and the regression analyses should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.