Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892406›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Persistent Gaps in the Ultimate Mechanisms of Antimicrobial-Induced Bacterial Killing.

Arpita Nath, Alexandro Rodríguez-Rojas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arpita NathInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Strasse 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7173-0671
Alexandro Rodríguez-RojasClinical Department for Small Animals and Horses, Division of Small Animal Internal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4119-8127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics remain pillars of modern medicine, yet the mechanisms underlying bacterial killing remain incompletely understood. This review addresses unresolved questions in antibiotic lethality, focusing on poorly defined cell-level events. How coinciding stress responses combine to drive killing, and how cells prioritise protective pathways are unclear. Metabolic state strongly modulates lethality, as growth rate, nutrient availability, and respiratory activity determine whether damage reaches a fatal threshold. A small subpopulation of genetically identical cells persists through treatment, but the signals governing entry and maintenance of this state remain elusive. The contribution of reactive oxygen species is context-dependent and debated. Species-specific differences in autolysin activation during cell wall targeting lack unifying principles, while ribosome-targeting antibiotics also induce secondary membrane perturbations whose mechanistic links to translation arrest are unresolved. Biofilms further complicate killing by limiting drug penetration and slowing growth, and host factors such as oxygen tension, pH, and immune pressure reshape bacterial responses in ways that are only beginning to be understood. Addressing these blind spots may reveal new vulnerabilities in bacterial physiology and guide the development of therapeutic strategies that improve killing while limiting tolerance and persistence.

Indexed as

antimicrobial effectbiofilmsefflux mechanismskilling of bacteriametabolic statepersister cellsreactive oxygen species (ROS)stress reactions

Identifiers

PMID41892406
PMCPMC13024606

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.