ArticleClinics and practice2026
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression with Comorbid Autism Spectrum Disorder: Three Case Reports.
Article in Clinics and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and contributes significantly to the global burden of disease. Recent data show an increasing prevalence of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often exhibit MDD as a comorbidity and it is often resistant to conventional treatments. ASD determines emotional dysregulation and a reduced ability to understand mental states (mentalization). These features can lead to suicidal ideation and/or behavior. Intranasal esketamine may offer a novel therapeutic option for this population.
methodsThis case series focuses on the clinical response to intranasal esketamine in patients with autism and TRD; esketamine is approved in Italy as an add-on therapy in TRD, so our case study is based on an in-label treatment. Three young patients (
resultsDespite differences in clinical profile, all patients showed good efficacy of esketamine in reducing depressive symptoms: two patients experienced clinical remission at T5 (MADRS < 10), one patient showed partial response (dMADRS = 43.24%). No major side effects were reported. Significant improvements were observed after the first week of treatment (P1: MADRS_T0 = 37, MADRS_T1 = 12; P2: MADRS_T0 = 32, MADRS_T1 = 21; P3: MADRS_T0 = 25, MADRS_T1 = 12). Depressive relapses occurred (e.g., P1, T3-T4), but they were not associated with hospitalizations and/or suicidal attempts. Suicidal ideation, when present, decreased by the end of the follow-up period. Lack of mentalization and in social cognition was noted, with just mild improvements during therapy. Subjective quality of life improved significantly for all patients (P1: 28% at T0, 73% at T5. P2: 25% at T0, 71% at T5. P3: 35% at T0, 80% at T5).
conclusionsIntranasal esketamine showed a favorable efficacy and safety in these three cases of TRD in comorbidity with ASD (at six months: total remission = 66.66%, partial remission = 33.33%, inefficacy = 0%, drop-out = 0, severe adverse events = 0). Besides improvements in depressive symptoms, esketamine was associated with a constant decrease in suicidal thoughts. A case series is unfit to form statistical conclusions; preliminary data warrant further investigation in randomized controlled studies to validate the therapeutic potential of esketamine in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.