ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An EV-Guided Multi-Compartment Proof-of-Concept Framework for Biomarker Prioritization in Cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy in which numerous biomarker candidates have been reported, yet few progress to clinical use. Beyond biological complexity, this low translational yield reflects the lack of systematic criteria for prioritizing biomarkers during the discovery stage. In particular, tumor-derived signals identified in tissue often fail to persist in clinically accessible biofluids, as cross-compartment signal behavior is rarely evaluated explicitly.
methodsWe developed an extracellular vesicle (EV)-guided, multi-compartment proof-of-concept framework to assess biomarker robustness and translatability early in discovery. EV proteomes from three biologically distinct CCA cell lines and a normal cholangiocyte were analyzed using multivariate and machine-learning-assisted approaches to identify conserved EV-associated features. These were integrated with public transcriptomic, epigenetic, copy-number, promoter usage, and miRNA regulatory data. Tissue relevance was assessed using TCGA/GTEx RNA-seq datasets, and exploratory signal behavior was examined in pooled serum- and urine-derived EVs from CCA patients and controls.
resultsEV proteomics revealed marked molecular heterogeneity across CCA models but identified a small subset of conserved EV-associated proteins. SERPINF2 was used as a representative example, showing consistently reduced EV-associated abundance across all CCA models with coordinated regulation across multiple molecular layers. SERPINF2 expression was independent of patient sex and tumor stage and clearly distinguished tumor from normal bile duct tissue. Exploratory biofluid analyses demonstrated compartment-dependent signal behavior, with SERPINF2 depletion detectable in urine-derived EVs but not in serum-derived EVs.
conclusionsRather than validating a single biomarker, this study presents an EV-guided, multi-compartment framework for prioritizing biomarker candidates at the discovery stage. By explicitly accounting for tumor heterogeneity and compartment-specific signal preservation, this proof-of-concept approach provides a practical decision-support strategy for identifying biomarkers with greater translational potential in heterogeneous cancers such as CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.