ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Evidence-Guided Diagnostic Reasoning for Pediatric Chest Radiology Based on Multimodal Large Language Models.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric respiratory diseases are a leading cause of hospital admissions and childhood mortality worldwide, highlighting the critical need for accurate and timely diagnosis to support effective treatment and long-term care. Chest radiography remains the most widely used imaging modality for pediatric pulmonary assessment. Consequently, reliable AI-assisted diagnostic methods are essential for alleviating the workload of clinical radiologists. However, most existing deep learning-based approaches are data-driven and formulate diagnosis as a black-box image classification task, resulting in limited interpretability and reduced clinical trustworthiness. To address these challenges, we propose a trustworthy two-stage diagnostic paradigm for pediatric chest X-ray diagnosis that closely aligns with the radiological workflow in clinical practice, in which the diagnosis procedure is constrained by evidence. In the first stage, a vision-language model fine-tuned on pediatric data identifies radiological findings from chest radiographs, producing structured and interpretable diagnostic evidence. In the second stage, a multimodal large language model integrates the radiograph, extracted findings, patient demographic information, and external medical domain knowledge with RAG mechanism to generate the final diagnosis. Experiments conducted on the VinDr-PCXR dataset demonstrate that our method achieves 90.1% diagnostic accuracy, 70.9% F1-score, and 82.5% AUC, representing up to a 13.1% increase in diagnosis accuracy over the state-of-the-art baselines. These results validate the effectiveness of combining multimodal reasoning with explicit medical evidence and domain knowledge, and indicate the strong potential of the proposed approach for trustworthy pediatric radiology diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.