ReviewToxins2026
Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Stiff Person Syndrome-A Critical Review and Update.
Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stiff person syndrome (SPS) is an autoimmune disorder with muscle stiffness and spasms, for which current therapies provide incomplete relief. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has been explored as an adjunctive symptomatic treatment. The aim of this review was to critically evaluate the clinical evidence for BoNT therapy in SPS. Using Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar, we identified nine reports that were published up to 1 January 2026. English articles and articles with information on study type, type/dose of BoNT and treatment results were included. One study was double-blind and placebo-controlled, one was retrospective and seven were single-case reports, comprising 46 patients. Open-label trials used botulinumtoxin-A (Botox, Dysport or Xeomin), while the blind study applied abobotulinumA (Dysport). All but one study (a case report) demonstrated motor improvement and a reduction in painful spasms associated with patient satisfaction. Reported doses ranged from 300 to 800 units for onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA and from 700 to 1000 units for abobotulinumtoxinA. The literature highlights the need for randomized clinical trials in larger cohorts, with careful selection of dose, injection sites, and adjunct physiotherapy, as well as an evaluation of early BoNT therapy in SPS. The novelty of this review lies in its critical synthesis of reported data and inclusion of most recent reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.