ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sex-Based Differences in Fatigue During Repeated Sprinting in 9- to 14-Year-Old Children Are Task- and Metric-Dependent.
Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated sex-based differences in sprint performance and fatigue among 9-14-year-olds using two repeated-sprint protocols: the Muscle Power Sprint Test (MPST; 6 × 15 m) and the Children's Repetitive Intermittent Sprint Performance test (CRISP; 6 × 30 m). Additionally, four fatigue metrics were compared: decay (first vs. last sprint), fatigue index (fastest vs. slowest sprint), sprint decrement (ideal vs. actual total time), and slope IP (regression slope across all sprints).
methodsA total of 140 children (9-14 years; 70 females, 70 males) performed the two tests in randomized order. They completed the six sprints per test with 10 s of recovery between each sprint of either 15 or 30 m. Fatigue metrics were calculated for each test based on the sprint times.
resultsRunning speed was higher in CRISP than in MPST, and males outperformed females in both tests. In the MPST, fatigue metrics did not differ significantly by sex. In contrast, all fatigue indices in CRISP were significantly greater in females, indicating higher fatigue despite slower sprinting compared to males. Among the fatigue metrics, slope IP correlated most strongly with decay, while associations with fatigue index and sprint decrement were weaker.
conclusionsFatigue assessment is more sensitive over longer sprint distances. Females demonstrated significant fatigue in CRISP, indicating that fatigue is task-dependent. The slope metric, which incorporates all sprints, offers a robust fatigue measure for group comparison, while decay remains a practical alternative for field settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.