Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
A novel nasal cannula versus conventional face mask for preventing hypoxemia during flexible bronchoscopy in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintaining adequate oxygenation during pediatric bronchoscopy is critical for patient safety and procedural success. This study evaluates a novel supraglottic oxygen delivery technique designed to improve intraoperative oxygenation via a less invasive, more efficient approach. In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, children undergoing elective bronchoscopy were randomly assigned to receive oxygen through a novel nasal cannula (NNO) or conventional face mask (CMO), using computer-generated allocation sequences with concealed envelopes. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypoxemia (SpO₂ < 90% for > 10 s). Secondary outcomes included minimum SpO₂, severe hypoxemia (SpO₂ < 80%), frequency of mask ventilation due to desaturation, operator satisfaction with airway access and visual field, and time to first hypoxemic episode. Safety was assessed by comparing adverse event rates. In the intention-to-treat analysis of 199 randomized children, the incidence of hypoxemia was significantly lower in the NNO group than in the CMO group (6.0% vs. 18.2%; RR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.80; p = 0.008). Per-protocol analysis yielded consistent results (5.1% vs. 20.5%; p = 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, NNO remained a significant independent protective factor against hypoxemia (aOR = 0.272, 95% CI 0.098-0.753; p = 0.012). Secondary outcomes also favored NNO: lowest recorded SpO₂ was higher (94.9% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.003), mask interventions were fewer (2 vs. 13, p = 0.005), and time to hypoxemia was significantly prolonged (aHR = 0.203, 95% CI 0.075-0.547; p = 0.002).
conclusionIn children with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II undergoing flexible bronchoscopy, the novel nasal cannula was more effective than the conventional face mask in preventing hypoxemia and reducing procedural interruptions.
trial registrationThe Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (chiCTR.gov): No. ChiCTR2500113734, Retrospectively registered, Date of registration: December 2, 2025. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Maintaining adequate oxygenation is essential for ensuring patient safety and procedural success during pediatric flexible bronchoscopy. • Conventional face masks (CMO) are widely used for oxygen delivery; however, they may be insufficient in preventing intraoperative hypoxemia. WHAT IS NEW: • A novel nasal cannula (NNO) significantly reduces the incidence of hypoxemia (6.0% vs. 18.2%) compared to CMO in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. • The use of NNO is associated with higher minimum SpO₂ levels, a longer time to onset of first hypoxemic event, and fewer procedural interruptions due to rescue ventilation, thereby providing a less invasive and more effective oxygenation strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.