Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894063›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Serum metabolomics of diabetic dogs treated with daily administration of a commercially available lyophilized feces preparation.

Jose D J Ruiz Romero, Patrick Barko, Jan S Suchodolski, David A Williams, Holly H Ganz, Arnon Gal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jose D J Ruiz RomeroDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA.
Patrick BarkoDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA.
Jan S SuchodolskiGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
David A WilliamsDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA.
Holly H GanzAnimalBiome, Oakland, CA, 94609, USA.
Arnon GalDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA. agal2@illinois.edu.

Funding

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Companion Animal Research Grant Program Vera Arvilla Traxler Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteric microbial dysbiosis can contribute to the pathobiology of canine diabetes mellitus (DM) by interfering with host metabolism, promoting inflammation, and altering incretin hormone responses. Enriching and diversifying an unbalanced gastrointestinal microbiome with microbiome-based interventions such as lyophilized fecal preparations (LFP) can help improve gut function and glycemic control of diabetic dogs. This study aimed to determine the differences in the serum metabolomes, levels of interstitial glucose (IG), and 24-hour water intake of diabetic dogs treated with daily administration of LFP or placebo. A prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted using six DM dogs in the LFP group and six DM dogs in the placebo group. Dogs had physical examinations and 24-hour water intake assessments at admission, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks, with continuous IG monitoring performed throughout the study. Serum samples were collected longitudinally at baseline and during follow-up for untargeted metabolomic analysis. The marginal mean of IG after 8 weeks was lower in the LFP group (286 ± 22 mg/dL vs. 309 ± 22 mg/dL; p = 0.468), with the LFP group showing lower marginal mean IG at each time point except week five. Marginal mean log 24-hour water intake was significantly lower in the LFP group compared to placebo (mean difference − 0.24 ± 0.10, p = 0.024). Treatment groups significantly differed in metabolites with important roles in carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism. Overall, our results show that LFP induced measurable metabolic alterations, with patterns generally consistent with a more favorable metabolic profile, but only minimal improvement in glycemic control.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDog DiseasesFecesMetabolomeAnimalsBlood GlucoseDogsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFreeze DryingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaleMetabolomicsProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseCanine diabetes mellitusGut microbiome modulationInsulin sensitivityMetabolite profilingRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41894063
PMCPMC13031211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.