Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41895697›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026

A Framework for Developing Intake and Use Guidance for Dietary Supplement Bioactives.

Janet A Novotny, Johanna Dwyer, Mario G Ferruzzi, Bill Gurley, Tasija Karosas, Colin D Kay, Esther Myers, Andrew Shao, Connie M Weaver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Janet A NovotnyBeltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agriculture Research Center, USDA, Beltsville, MD, United States. Electronic address: janet.novotny@usda.gov.
Johanna DwyerDepartment of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine and Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Mario G FerruzziCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Bill GurleyNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS, United States.
Tasija KarosasThe International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Colin D KayArkansas Children's Nutrition Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Esther MyersInternational Affiliate of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, United States; EF Myers Consulting, Inc., Trenton, IL, United States.
Andrew ShaoNiagen Bioscience, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Connie M WeaverSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary bioactives, which are commonly found in food, beverages, and dietary supplements, include nonessential food components that can support health beyond preventing nutrient deficiencies. Despite their known health benefits and potential for adverse effects, there is limited guidance on appropriate intake levels, safety, and efficacy of these ingredients, particularly those present in dietary supplements. This lack of guidance can be challenging for individuals attempting to make informed decisions about products marketed for health benefits. A previously published perspective proposed a 4-step framework for developing quantitative intake recommendations for bioactive constituents in food. This framework addressed bioactive characterization, safety evaluation, efficacy assessment, and how to develop intake levels from foods. However, it did not account for the unique considerations of bioactives consumed in dietary supplement form. The current paper builds on the original framework by addressing the specific factors that must be considered when developing intake guidance for bioactive constituents found in dietary supplements. These include differences in dose, matrix, purity, bioavailability, and intended use. In doing so, this paper aims to advance the development of evidence-based recommendations for supplements, while also highlighting the fundamental distinctions between bioactive constituents delivered through food and diet compared with those delivered through dietary supplements.

Indexed as

DietDietary SupplementsNutrition PolicyPhytochemicalsBiological AvailabilityHumansPhytochemicalsbioactivesbioactive substancesdietary ingredientsdietary supplementsrecommendationsrisk

Identifiers

PMID41895697
PMCPMC13294610

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.