ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Potential of SERS and proteomics for biomarker detection in cancer cells.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the use of quantitative LC-MS/MS-based proteomics and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for biomarker detection in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Two HL cell models with distinct TP53 status were utilized to evaluate the effects of etoposide, a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agent, and resveratrol, a polyphenolic compound with known chemosensitizing activity. For SERS, the best performance was achieved by applying logistic regression to classify different treatment conditions and identify discriminative spectral features in the data. Proteomics showed highly reproducible and accurate results with relative standard deviations of below 5% for the sample preparation and about 2% for the measurements. Proteomic profiling revealed a TP53-dependent organization of metabolic and stress-response pathways and demonstrated that cryopreserved aliquots yielded the most consistent proteomic signatures. Treatment-dependent regulation of key biomarker proteins showed direct correspondence to specific SERS features, such as reduced nucleotide/cytochrome-associated signals and enhanced amide and aromatic amino acid signals. Our findings highlight the strength of applying reproducible proteomic profiling with machine learning-guided SERS analysis to improve molecular interpretation and to validate potential biomarkers in cancer research. Future work will focus on refining the analytical workflow and extending it toward integrative multi-omics applications, enabling more comprehensive biomarker detection and mechanistic insight into classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This strategy will be extended to additional model systems-such as metastatic melanoma, melanocytes, and ultimately patient-derived leukemia cells-to help bridge the gap toward clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.