ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
From empirical caution to precision resumption: model-informed management of a binimetinib overdose in a frail elderly patient.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo demonstrate how Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) enables the transition from empirical discontinuation to precise, safe, and rational treatment resumption, as illustrated by the management of a substantial binimetinib overdose in a frail elderly patient.
methodsWe present the case of an 80-year-old female (50 kg) with BRAF V600R-mutated metastatic melanoma who inadvertently received 135 mg of binimetinib twice daily (270 mg/day) instead of the recommended 45 mg twice daily. In the absence of overdose guidelines, a multidisciplinary workflow integrating pharmacovigilance assessment and model-informed simulations was initiated. A population pharmacokinetic model of binimetinib was used to simulate the patient-specific washout and estimate the optimal timing for therapy resumption at the median steady-state trough concentration (Cmin, ss). A virtual population (n = 10,000) receiving the standard regimen was simulated, excluding the 5th and 95th percentiles to remove aberrant predictions.
resultsAside from bilateral subretinal fluid not requiring discontinuation, no acute dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Simulations estimated a target median Cmin, ss of 103.1 µg/L (CV 47.8%; range 16.8–230.0 µg/L). The patient’s predicted time to return within this exposure target was ~ 37 h after the first overdose. Treatment was resumed at 36 h, omitting one scheduled dose. Measured binimetinib concentration at resumption was 52 µg/L, within the predicted variability range. The patient tolerated reinitiation, ocular findings resolved completely within two weeks.
conclusionThis case illustrates that MIPD provides a rational alternative to empirical prolonged discontinuation after medication errors. By quantifying exposure and variability, therapy resumption was optimized in a frail patient with high oncologic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41896433What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.