ReviewMolecular systems biology2026
Progress and new challenges in image-based profiling.
Review in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrieval-Based Evaluation of Cell Painting Feature Spaces Reveals Differences in the Preservation of Biologically Meaningful Phenotypic Similarity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Scalable data harmonization for single-cell image-based profiling with CytoTable.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Single-cell hit calling in high-content imaging screens with Buscar.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven high-content imaging decodes for NLRP7-mutant recurrent hydatidiform moles.iScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For over two decades, image-based profiling has revolutionized cell phenotype analysis. Image-based profiling processes rich, high-throughput, microscopy data into thousands of unbiased measurements that reveal phenotypic patterns powerful for drug discovery, functional genomics, and cell state classification. Here, we review the evolving computational landscape of image-based profiling, detailing the bioinformatics processes involved from feature extraction to normalization and batch correction. We discuss how deep learning has fundamentally reshaped the field. We examine key methodological advancements, such as single-cell analysis, the development of robust similarity metrics, and the expansion into new modalities like optical pooled screening, temporal imaging, and 3D organoid profiling. We also highlight the growth of public benchmarks and open-source software ecosystems as a key driver for fostering reproducibility and collaboration. Despite these advances, the field still faces substantial challenges, particularly in developing methods for emerging temporal and 3D data modalities, establishing robust quality control standards and workflows, and interpreting the processed features. By focusing on the technical evolution of image-based profiling rather than the wide-ranging biological applications, our aim with this review is to provide researchers with a roadmap for navigating the progress and new challenges in this rapidly advancing domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.