Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896452›Full record

ReviewMolecular systems biology2026

Progress and new challenges in image-based profiling.

Erik Serrano, John Peters, Jesko Wagner, Rebecca E Graham, Zhenghao Chen, Brian Y Feng, Gisele Miranda, Alexandr A Kalinin, Loan Vulliard, Jenna Tomkinson and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Single-cell hit calling in high-content imaging screens with Buscar.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Erik SerranoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.
John PetersMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8564-3264
Jesko WagnerMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9805-7192
Rebecca E GrahamCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Zhenghao ChenCalico Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian Y FengCalico Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-8624
Gisele MirandaDepartment of Computational Science and Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexandr A KalininImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-3226
Loan VulliardSystems Immunology and Single-Cell Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jenna TomkinsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-5813
Cameron MattsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.
Michael J LippincottDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ziqi KangResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2084-610X
Divya SitaniDepartment of Systems Medicine, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-6108
Dave BuntenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.
Srijit SealImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2790-8679
Neil O CarragherCancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-9747
Anne E CarpenterImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1555-8261
Shantanu SinghImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3150-3025
Paula A Marin ZapataBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Juan C CaicedoMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-4631
Gregory P WayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA. gregory.way@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-9348

Funding

Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
Extracting rich information from biological imagesR35GM122547 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Anne E. Carpenter · 2017 to 2026
$6.2M
Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer (ALSF) 23-28306American Heart Association (AHA) 24CSA1255857Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) DAF2021-225261Gilbert Family Foundation (GFF) 923014HHS | NIH | U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) 5T15LM007359HHS | NIH | U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) T15LM009451Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) RGY0081/2019National Science Foundation (NSF) 2348683NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122547Silicon Valley Community Foundation 10.13039/100014989UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_ST_00035UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/Ro15635/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over two decades, image-based profiling has revolutionized cell phenotype analysis. Image-based profiling processes rich, high-throughput, microscopy data into thousands of unbiased measurements that reveal phenotypic patterns powerful for drug discovery, functional genomics, and cell state classification. Here, we review the evolving computational landscape of image-based profiling, detailing the bioinformatics processes involved from feature extraction to normalization and batch correction. We discuss how deep learning has fundamentally reshaped the field. We examine key methodological advancements, such as single-cell analysis, the development of robust similarity metrics, and the expansion into new modalities like optical pooled screening, temporal imaging, and 3D organoid profiling. We also highlight the growth of public benchmarks and open-source software ecosystems as a key driver for fostering reproducibility and collaboration. Despite these advances, the field still faces substantial challenges, particularly in developing methods for emerging temporal and 3D data modalities, establishing robust quality control standards and workflows, and interpreting the processed features. By focusing on the technical evolution of image-based profiling rather than the wide-ranging biological applications, our aim with this review is to provide researchers with a roadmap for navigating the progress and new challenges in this rapidly advancing domain.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsDeep LearningHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopyPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareCell ProfilingDeep LearningFeature ExtractionImage-Based ProfilingPhenotypic Screening

Identifiers

PMID41896452
PMCPMC13144522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.