Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896561›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A dataset of insect sounds from 459 species for bioacoustic machine learning.

Marius Faiß, Burooj Ghani, Dan Stowell

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marius FaißDepartment for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany. mfaiss@ab.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4232-8392
Burooj GhaniNaturalis Biodiversity Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dan StowellNaturalis Biodiversity Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8068-3769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic recognition of insect sound could help us understand changing biodiversity trends around the world-but insect sounds are challenging to recognize even for deep learning, due to the broad frequency ranges and limited amount of training data. We present a new dataset comprised of 26298 audio files (226.6 hours), from 459 species of Orthoptera (310 species) and Cicadidae (149 species). InsectSet459 is the first large-scale dataset of insect sound that is easily applicable for developing novel deep-learning methods. Its recordings were made with a variety of audio recorders using varying sample rates to capture the extremely broad range of frequencies that insects produce. We benchmark performance with two state-of-the-art deep learning classifiers, demonstrating good performance but also significant room for improvement in acoustic insect classification. This dataset can serve as a realistic test case for implementing insect monitoring workflows, and as a challenging basis for the development of audio representation methods that can handle highly variable frequencies and/or sample rates.

Indexed as

InsectaMachine LearningOrthopteraSoundAcousticsAnimalsDeep Learning

Identifiers

PMID41896561
PMCPMC13035933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.