Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896617›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Molecular basis for inhibition of α-thrombin activity by bacterial lipopolysaccharides.

André L Lira, Katelyn C Drew, Rodrigo L M Dantas, Jiaqing Pang, Owen J T McCarty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

André L LiraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, 97239, USA. dasilva@ohsu.edu.
Katelyn C DrewDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, 97239, USA.
Rodrigo L M DantasDepartment of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, 12245-000, Brazil.
Jiaqing PangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, 97239, USA.
Owen J T McCartyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, 97239, USA.

Funding

NIH HHS R01HL144133, R01HL101972, and R01AI157037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of the coagulation pathway is a hallmark of endotoxemia and Gram-negative sepsis, leading to disseminated intravascular coagulation resulting from aberrant thrombin generation. Bacterial components such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) have been shown to indirectly contribute to thrombin generation by activating or assembling members of the coagulation cascade in an LPS-chemotype dependent manner. Conversely, studies have shown that LPS may directly inhibit thrombin activity through an undefined mechanism. We studied whether the LPS chemotypes from bacteria including Escherichia coli (O111:B4, O26:B6), Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bind and regulate thrombin activity. We found that these LPS chemotypes bound thrombin exosites via their polysaccharide regions. Only the E.coli O26:B6 and K.pneumoniae LPS chemotypes induced global structural changes in thrombin. Both the monomeric forms of E.coli O26:B6 and K.pneumoniae LPS chemotypes reduced the catalytic efficiency of thrombin and thrombin-dependent fibrin polymerization in purified systems. The E.coli O26:B6 LPS chemotype retained anticoagulant activity in plasma as an Ca

Indexed as

LipopolysaccharidesThrombinBlood CoagulationEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeProtein BindingPseudomonas aeruginosaLipopolysaccharidesThrombinBacteriaCoagulationInfectionLipopolysaccharideSepsisThrombin

Identifiers

PMID41896617
PMCPMC13040036

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.