ReviewJournal of intensive care2026
The hemodynamics of tracheal intubation in critically ill patients: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: beyond the airway, toward hemodynamic precision.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Airway management in critically ill patients with obesity.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTracheal intubation is a ubiquitous but high-risk procedure in critically ill patients, often required in the setting of severe hypoxemia, shock, or metabolic acidosis. Despite being a life-saving procedure, it is associated with a high incidence of peri-intubation adverse events. In a large international study (INTUBE), more than 40% of intubations in critically ill patients were complicated by cardiovascular instability, approximately 10% by severe hypoxemia, and over 3% by cardiac arrest, highlighting the magnitude of risk in this population. Among these complications, cardiovascular instability-particularly hypotension-emerges as the most frequent and most consequential, being independently associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality. However, robust randomized evidence to guide optimal peri-intubation hemodynamic management remains scarce, leaving clinicians to rely largely on physiologic reasoning. MAIN BODY: Hemodynamic physiology during intubation is highly dynamic and influenced by cumulative and interacting threats. Critically ill patients often present with an endogenous catecholamine surge that temporarily preserves perfusion but reflects a fragile reserve. The administration of induction agents rapidly abolishes this sympathetic drive, leading to abrupt decreases in systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output. Apnea introduces hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and acidosis, all of which further impair myocardial contractility and catecholaminergic response, with increased arrhythmogenic risk. The subsequent initiation of positive-pressure ventilation raises intrathoracic pressure, reduces venous return, and increases right ventricular afterload, especially in the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome with hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction or pulmonary microthrombosis. Finally, post-intubation sedation, ventilator settings, and vasopressor therapy continue to shape the hemodynamic trajectory.
conclusionsThis narrative review synthesizes current evidence and physiological insights into a structured timeline extending from induction to post-intubation care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.