ReviewBiomolecules2026
Nuclear Mechanics and Nuclear Mechanotransduction in Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction are involved in the migration and invasion process, such as those in which the cells need to deform themselves to pass through constrictions. Specifically, properties like nuclear softness, viscoelasticity, plasticity (like nuclear pore complexes) and deformability are critical in cancer and its malignant progression. The nucleus represents a physical barrier for the migration and invasion in dense 3D extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds. Therefore, the deformability of the nucleus seems to determine the migration limit in circumstances where the enzymatic remodeling of the surroundings is impaired. There are still significant knowledge gaps regarding effects of nuclear deformation during cancer dissemination. It seems that nuclear deformation can alter gene transcription, induce alternative splicing processes, impact nuclear envelope rupture, nuclear pore complex dilatation, damage the DNA, and increase the genomic instability. These mechanically induced alterations can in turn impact the migratory behavior of the cancer cells. The stiffness of the nucleus relies on the condensation of chromatin, and the nuclear lamina, which consists of a network of intermediate filaments underneath the nuclear envelope. All of this is discussed in the review and it is argued that nuclear deformability is universally found in various cancer types. Another focus is placed on the nuclear envelope proteins like emerin, and the SUN-KASH complex and how they contribute to the Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, which consequently couples the nucleus and the cytoskeleton. It is argued that this connection is crucial for force transmission, which governs nuclear stiffness dynamically, depending on the force applied. In this review, recent findings are described that couple ECM-induced nuclear mechanosensing and mechanotransduction with the migration and invasion of cancer cells. Moreover, it is suspected that changes in the mechanosensory characteristics of the cell nucleus could play a pivotal part in the malignancy of cancer cells and the heterogeneity of tumors. Finally, it is discussed what impact the individual elements of the nucleus offer to mechanically alter cellular migration and invasion in cancer and its malignant progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.