ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Wild Edible Fruits: A Structured Narrative Review on Bioactive Composition and Bioactivity.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trace and Macroelement Profiles in Wild and Cultivated Fruits From Serbia.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild edible fruits (WEFs) represent an important yet underutilised component of biodiversity-based nutrition and functional food research. This structured narrative review critically synthesises current evidence on the phytochemical composition and nutritional relevance, biological activities, and sustainability dimensions of WEFs, with emphasis on fruit pulp as the primary edible tissue. A systematic search strategy following PRISMA-based principles was applied to enhance methodological transparency; however, due to high heterogeneity in species, analytical methods, and outcome measures, quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible. The review integrates compositional data (phenolics, carotenoids, tocopherols, sterols, vitamin C, and minerals) with reported bioactivities, while explicitly distinguishing between in vitro assays, in vivo studies, and limited clinical evidence. Particular attention is given to analytical variability, bioavailability constraints, dose-response relationships, and translational limitations that affect the interpretation of antioxidant and other health-related claims. Beyond bioactivity, the manuscript contextualises WEFs within socio-economic, conservation, and sustainable food system frameworks. By combining chemical characterisation, evidence hierarchy, and sustainability analysis, this review provides a critical and multidisciplinary perspective that advances understanding of WEFs and identifies priorities for future research, including standardised methodologies and well-designed human intervention trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.