ReviewBiomedicines2026
MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential, Challenges, and Clinical Reliability.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the rise in precision medicine, breast cancer management still lacks the non-invasive tools necessary to track tumor dynamics in real time. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as strong candidates to fill this gap, particularly within the liquid biopsy framework. Their inherent stability in circulation and their ability to reflect specific molecular changes make them compelling biomarkers for clinical use. This review outlines the current state of miRNA research in breast cancer, specifically assessing their utility in early diagnosis and the prediction of patient outcomes. The focus is on a range of high-priority targets, such as miR-21, miR-155, and the miR-200 family, which have demonstrated consistent dysregulation across different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. These molecules offer a distinct advantage over traditional protein markers by providing a more precise look at tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. However, the transition from discovery to clinical practice remains blocked by technical inconsistencies. The lack of standardized protocols for RNA isolation and the difficulty in identifying reliable reference genes for normalization continue to affect reproducibility. While the potential for these biomarkers is well-documented, the field must now shift its focus toward establishing clinical reliability. Large-scale prospective validation studies are on the horizon to facilitate this implementation. All in all, international consortia and multi-center trials are required to test circulating miRNA biomarkers in real-world settings, ensuring they are feasible enough to guide routine oncological decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.