ReviewBiomedicines2026
Dissecting Cellulitis of the Scalp: Linking Pathogenesis to Therapy.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS) is a chronic, inflammatory follicular occlusion disorder characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts that lead to scarring alopecia. The therapeutic goal is to limit disease progression and the extent of scarring. Although DCS is traditionally managed with systemic retinoids, antibiotics, and surgical interventions, therapeutic responses are variable and long-term remission remains challenging. Recent insights into the immunological overlap between DCS, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), and other autoinflammatory follicular disorders have expanded therapeutic options, particularly with biologic agents targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-17, and IL-23 pathways, as well as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. This review synthesizes the current evidence on medical, procedural, and emerging targeted therapies for DCS, incorporating data from case reports, case series, retrospective cohorts, and recent systematic reviews up to 2025. Special emphasis is placed on the evolving role of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors, which show growing promise for refractory or syndromic presentations. Current evidence supports a stepwise, phenotype-driven approach in which systemic retinoids remain first-line systemic therapy, while biologics represent a rational and increasingly evidence-supported option for moderate-to-severe, treatment-resistant, or syndromic disease. Further controlled studies are needed to define optimal sequencing, duration, and combination strategies for long-term management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.