Evidence mapPaperPMID 41898421Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumour Microenvironment: Interactions Across Hypoxia, Vasculature and Immune Modulation.

Karina Biserova, Ilze Strumfa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karina BiserovaDepartment of Pathology, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Ilze StrumfaDepartment of Pathology, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-9524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumour known for its ability to resist the current treatment protocols. A major reason for this resistance is a minor group of cells within the tumour called glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). These cells drive tumour growth, invasion, and recurrence after therapy. GSCs survive and expand within a specific microenvironment that protects and supports them. Three of the most important niches are: hypoxic (low oxygen) regions, which trigger survival pathways and make GSCs more resistant to treatment; perivascular areas near blood vessels, which provide nutrients and signals that maintain stem-like properties; and immune-related zones, where inflammatory and suppressive signals help GSCs escape the body's defences. Together, these environments allow GSCs to thrive and contribute to the tumour's persistence. This review highlights how hypoxia, blood vessel niches, and immune interactions work together to sustain GSCs and promote GBM progression. A clearer understanding of these supportive environments may lead to new treatment approaches aimed at disrupting GSC survival and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHypoxiaImmunomodulationNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsHumansNeovascularization, Pathologiccancercancer stem cellsglioblastomamicroenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41898421
PMCPMC13027279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.