Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898610›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Clonal Hematopoiesis (CHIP) in Pulmonary Embolism and CTEPH: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Risk Stratification.

Lukasz Szarpak, Monika E Jach, Michal Skoczylas, Sebastian Radej, Michal Pruc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lukasz SzarpakInstitute of Medical Science, Collegium Medicum, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-5455
Monika E JachInstitute of Biological Sciences, Collegium Medicum, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4932-3260
Michal SkoczylasInstitute of Biological Sciences, Collegium Medicum, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland.
Sebastian RadejInstitute of Biological Sciences, Collegium Medicum, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4066-7566
Michal PrucInstitute of Medical Science, Collegium Medicum, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-9732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is biologically heterogeneous. Despite guideline-directed anticoagulation, a subset of patients develops recurrent venous thromboembolism, persistent exertional limitation, residual perfusion defects, and progression to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Conventional risk factors explain much of the index event but incompletely account for thrombus non-resolution and chronic sequelae. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP)-the age-associated expansion of hematopoietic clones carrying somatic mutations-defines a measurable thrombo-inflammatory endophenotype that is strongly genotype- and clone-size (variant allele frequency; VAF)-dependent. Across human studies, JAK2-CHIP and TET2-CHIP show the most consistent associations with VTE/PE, whereas isolated DNMT3A-CHIP is frequently neutral, and larger clones tend to confer stronger effects. Mechanistically, CHIP can bias myeloid cells toward inflammasome/IL-1β signaling and endothelial activation, increase monocyte tissue factor activity, and promote immunothrombosis with neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. NET-rich thrombi may adopt a dense fibrin-DNA-histone architecture that resists endogenous fibrinolysis, favoring organization and persistence. CTEPH offers a translational window to interrogate this model because thrombotic material and deep phenotyping are accessible. We synthesize genotype- and VAF-resolved clinical and mechanistic evidence using a structured strength-of-evidence framework and propose a pragmatic phenotyping roadmap with testable predictions for prospective post-PE validation. CHIP testing in PE/CTEPH remains investigational and should not currently change standard care.

Indexed as

Clonal HematopoiesisHypertension, PulmonaryPulmonary EmbolismAnimalsDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Methyltransferase 3AExtracellular TrapsHumansJanus Kinase 2Risk FactorsDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Methyltransferase 3ADNMT3A protein, humanJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 2TET2 protein, humanCHIPCTEPDCTEPHfibrinolysisimmunothrombosisinflammasomeneutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)pulmonary embolismthrombus resolutionvariant allele frequency (VAF)

Identifiers

PMID41898610
PMCPMC13026496

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.